<?xml version="1.0" encoding="gbk"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>130影评网</title>
<link>http://www.130q.com/</link>
<copyright>Copyright (C) 130影评网 </copyright>
<generator>PBDIGG Version 2.0 周年版 Build 20081118</generator>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 12:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<item id="0">
<title><![CDATA[孤儿 英文影评 Orphan]]></title>
<link>http://www.130q.com/show.php?tid=4255</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><img alt="" src="http://t.douban.com/lpic/s3663082.jpg" /></p>
<p><br />
<strong>And when she was bad,she was very, very bad</strong><br />
by Roger Ebert</p>
<p><br />
After seeing &quot;<a target="_blank" href="www.130q.com">Orphan</a>,&quot; I now realize that Damien of &quot;The Omen&quot; was a model child. The Demon Seed was a bumper crop. Rosemary would have been happy to have this baby. Here is a shamelessly effective horror film based on the most diabolical of movie malefactors, a child.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Pity. Esther is such a bright child. So well-behaved. Her paintings are so masterful. She sits down at the piano and rips off a little Tchaikovsky. So why does her adoptive mother have such a fearful attitude toward her? Could it be because after her arrival, Kate, her new mom, got drunk and almost let her son Daniel drown? Had Max, a darling daughter, but then miscarried a third child? Is an alcoholic trying go stay sober? Just doesn&rsquo;t like the little orphan girl&rsquo;s looks?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>There is something eerie about her. Something too wise, too knowing, too penetrating. And why won&rsquo;t she remove those ribbons she always wears? And why does she dress like Little Bo-Peep when she goes to school? Daniel is cool toward her. Max is too young to be sure. Only John, the father, is convinced she&rsquo;s a bright kid, and blameless in a series of unfortunate events.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img alt="" src="http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcsi.dll/bilde?Site=EB&amp;Date=20090722&amp;Category=REVIEWS&amp;ArtNo=907229993&amp;Ref=AR&amp;Maxw=438" /></p>
<p><br />
Vera Farmiga is at the film&rsquo;s core as Kate, a onetime Yale music professor who feels she is unfairly targeted by her therapist, her husband and eventually the authorities. Peter Sarsgaard is John, the kind of understanding husband who doesn&rsquo;t understand a damned thing except that he is understanding. And Esther, the orphan, is played by Isabelle Fuhrman, who is not going to be convincing as a nice child for a long, long time.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&quot;Orphan&quot; hinges on a classic thriller device: the heroine who knows the truth and insists on it, even though everyone is convinced she&rsquo;s mad and wants to ship her off to rehab or even a mental institution. It&rsquo;s frustrating to know you&rsquo;re right when no one can see the truth you find so obvious.&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="http://www.130q.com"><font color="#ffffff">www.130q.com</font></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Things happen around Esther. A child falls from a playground slide. A car rolls down a hill. A nun comes into harm&rsquo;s way. Esther spreads disinformation. She&rsquo;s secretive. And sometimes she&rsquo;s so perfect, you want to wring her neck. When it turns out the orphanage has faulty info on Esther&rsquo;s Russian origins, Kate starts sniffing around in what her husband dismisses as paranoia.</p>
<p><br />
&quot;Orphan&quot; begins like your usual thriller, with Scare Alerts and False Alarms. You know, like a nice, peaceful shot until suddenly the sound blares and something rushes past the camera and &mdash; hey, it&rsquo;s only kids. We even get the old standby where Kate is looking in the medicine cabinet and closes it and ohmigod! &mdash; there&rsquo;s another face in the mirror! But hey, it&rsquo;s only her smiling husband.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Sarsgaard is well-cast in the role. He looks normal, sounds pleasant and yet can suggest something a little twitchy. Not that he&rsquo;s evil. Simply that he really should trust his wife more. Really.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>How the movie handles the other children, Daniel and Max, would probably have offended Gene Siskel, who had a thing about movies exploiting children in danger. This one sure does. What with the treehouse and the pond and the runaway SUV, it&rsquo;s amazing these kids are still able to function.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The climax is rather startling, combining the logic of the situation with audacity in exploiting its terror. Yet you have to hand it to &quot;Orphan.&quot; You want a good horror film about a child from hell, you got one. Do not, under any circumstances, take children to see it. Take my word on this.</p>
]]></description>
<pubDate>2009-07-25 02:06:06</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>